Sweden live cam sex
“We have to adapt to the internet world in which we live, and to me the Swedish prosecutors are doing just that.
Perhaps the closest parallel in Canada was the Kingston, Ont., case of Mark Bedford, convicted in 2008 of blackmailing several girls into performing sex acts on camera.
Of course, that raises another question: why rule against these drones when it could be relatively easy for amateur operators to ignore the decision?
The Swedish case came to light when police investigated Samstrom for another alleged sex crime and discovered he had video recordings of the young foreigners, said Wennerström.
He was found guilty of several offences, including child-pornography-related crimes, extortion and inciting a child to perform bestiality, earning a three-year prison sentence.
But Bedford was not charged with sexual assault or sexual interference, a similar offence often used when the victims are minors. Germain, general counsel for the Canadian Centre for Child Protection, said such crimes could possibly be prosecuted under this country’s “invitation to sexual touching” law or even sexual interference.
Camera-equipped drones are surveillance cameras, the court argues, and that means they need a permit indicating that they'll be used to prevent crime or accidents.
And since you , meanwhile, points out that the ruling doesn't make sense in the context of existing laws.
The victims in Canada were tracked down by the “super-professional” RCMP, who interviewed them on behalf of the Swedes.